Comparing Algorithm-Based and Friend-Based Recommendations on Audio Streaming Platforms

Authors

  • Anne Mareike Flaswinkel Department of Business Administration and Economics, Bielefeld University, Universitaetsstrasse 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
  • Reinhold Decker Department of Business Administration and Economics, Bielefeld University, Universitaetsstrasse 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.15673

Keywords:

Audio Streaming Platform, Recommendation. User Choice, Listening Intention, Algorithms, Recommendation Systems

Abstract

With the rise of audio streaming platforms (ASPs), users face the challenge of navigating a large amount of audio content. Companies are increasingly employing algorithms to provide personalized recommendations to their customers; however, word-of-mouth research has demonstrated in numerous studies the crucial role of friend-based recommendations, particularly in the realm of experience goods. Considering the experiential factor in ASPs, existing insights into recommendations raise the question of which recommendation source holds a greater advantage in the realm of ASPs. This study deals with recommendation sources in the field of ASPs and examines in particular the effects of algorithm-based suggestions on users' listening intentions. Using a quantitative research approach, we investigate users' attitudes toward recommended content and compare the intentions to listen to suggested content in cases of algorithmic and friend-based recommendations. Our results provide valuable insights for companies planning to provide helpful recommendations to ASP users and increase their listening intentions for recommended content.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-19

How to Cite

Flaswinkel, A. M., & Decker, R. (2024). Comparing Algorithm-Based and Friend-Based Recommendations on Audio Streaming Platforms. International Review of Management and Marketing, 14(2), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.15673

Issue

Section

Articles
Views
  • Abstract 326
  • FULL TEXT 309